Assessment replacing the Exam for BU3413 (Business Strategy).

Assessment replacing the Exam for BU3413 (Business Strategy).

 

Assignment 2: Write a short individual report examining the two sections below:

 

SECTION A:

In terms of the most recent events (e.g. Corona Virus) and therefore the current situation and circumstances facing most businesses today, analyse the external environmental forces influencing an industry of your choosing. Discuss how changes in the external environment require organisations to reconsider both their ‘strategic direction’ and ‘strategic change’ initiatives by using an organisational example or examples to support your views. (1250 Words).

 

SECTION B:

Apply Michael Porters ‘Five Forces Framework’ to an industry of your choice and examine the competitive nature of that industry. (750 Words).

 

NB: The total word count for the report is 2,000 words + or – 10%. Also please ensure that you acknowledge an author’s work to support your views and opinions by referencing according to the Harvard Referencing System.

 

Your report should then be submitted to Turnitin before 11.59pm on Monday 11th January 2021.

 

Grades Band Standard Descriptors (generic)
100%

94%

87%

Exceptional 1st

Very high 1st

High

Creative, insightful, illuminating, inspiring, exciting, authoritative, challenging. Considers several themes and examples with excellent referencing and analysis combining valid links to SDGs and Business and Society.
  80%

74%

Mid 1st

Low 1st

Persuasive, sophisticated, original, reflective, ambitious, meticulous, contains high standards of academic writing, meets the brief and puts forward compelling critical analysis and links well to other SDGs and Business and Society.
  68%

65%

62%

2.1 high merit,

2.1 mid merit

2.1 low merit

Fluent, thorough, analytical, precise, rigorous, confident, consistent, thoughtful, clear and well thought out points and analysis with relevant examples indicating impacts on Business and Society with relevant links to SDGs.
  58%

55%

52%

2.2 high pass

2.2 mid pass

2.2 low pass

Satisfactory, clear, accurate, careful, congruent, coherent, covers most of the brief but to lesser extent i.e. lacking in sufficient development but at a satisfactory level.
  48%

45%

42%

High 3rd

Mid third

Low third

Sufficient, adequate, descriptive, limited, just about meets the set criteria.

 

  40%

 

35%

Minimum pass/capped mark

Marginal fail

Incomplete, inadequate, inconsistent, derivative, contradictory, superficial, irrelevant, failing to address the question sufficiently
  30%

25%

Mid fail

Low fail

Erroneous/wrong, missing, extremely limited, inappropriate, insufficient, incoherent, unstructured, off point not worthy of a pass.
  10%

0%

Fail

Non-submission

Lacking, formless, detrimental, absent/none, irrelevant to the question set.