ENT3100 Innovation And Entrepreneurship
ENT3100 Entrepreneurship and Innovation Assessment Tasks and Marking Criteria
T2, 2021 Dr John Annakis.
Unit Assessment Details
Task and Details | Individual or Group | Weighting | Unit learning outcomes that this assessment task related to | Assessment due date |
1. Mid-term Test during the class | Individual | 15% | ULO1 | Due: week 6 |
2A. Business canvas Model | Group | 25% | ULOs 2, 3, 4, 5
and 6 |
Due: week 9 |
2B. Verbal pitch | Group | 10% | ULO 7 | Due: week 10 & 11 |
3. Exam | Individual | 50% | ULOs 1, 2, 3, 4,
5, 6 and 7 |
TBA |
Assessment Task 1- Mid-term Test Weighting: 15%
Due date: Week 6
Submission Style – take home down load from Moodle word file and answer multiple choice questions and send back completed answers. Opens 9 am Monday 30 August, 2021 submit by Thursday 2 September , 2021 5:00pm AEST.
The Mid-term test consist of 30 multiple Choice Questions.
Assessment Task 2A- Business Canvas Model (Group report) Weighting: 25%
Due date: Week 9 Word Limit: > 2500.
Submission style: Via Moodle
Topic: We’re looking for your innovative ideas for a new start-up. your group is to develop, it could be either a new business start -up or a social enterprise start-up. It original and your unique business which is designed for launching (not an existing business).
· Identify a problem you are passionate about addressing as a team
· Identify a way to address the problem through an innovative business solution
· Create a value proposition
· Articulate the business model
· Pitch the full solution
· Create the Business Model canvas
Pre-work:
In week 3, we form groups and you will be able to choose your group mates.
You need to develop a value proposition Canvas before developing the Business Canvas Model. You will work and complete the Value Proposition Canvas in tutorial on weeks 6, 7 and 8.
You are required to develop a Business Canvas Model that solves the market or social problem and submit your Business Canvas model through a provided link in the Moodle.
Assessment Task 2A- Rubric
HD 100-80% | D
79-70% |
C
69-60% |
P
59-50% |
F 49-0% | |
Introduction and background (10%) | Coherent introduction to both the report and the issue(s) under consideration incorporating thorough background
information |
The introduction grab attention, provides a succinct explanation of the purpose and structure of Business Model
Canvas |
Sound introduction to the report and/or the issue under investigation. Key background Details provided | Introduction is unclear and little background information is provided | No attempt |
Problem | Comprehensive and | Social problem | Application of | Limited | No attempt |
Definition | effective discussion | identified clearly | creative thinking | evidence of the | |
(15%) | of the | through a creative | tools to | use of creative | |
social problem | thinking tools and | uncover | thinking tools to | ||
identified with key | good use of | opportunities to | uncover | ||
references | statistics that | address identified | opportunities to | ||
and statistics used | explain the | social issue | address | ||
demonstrated | impact of the | identified social | |||
clearly the impact | social problem | issue | |||
and significance of | |||||
the social problem | |||||
Quality of | A highly innovative | A sound | An acceptable | Limited | No attempt |
Solution (20%) | and creative | innovative and | solution proposed | evidence of | |
solution proposed | creative solution | for the social | innovation and | ||
for the social | proposed for the | problem. Good | creative appears | ||
problem. Excellent | social problem. A | Social Impact | in the solution | ||
Social Impact | sound social | Theory | proposed. Little | ||
Theory articulated. | impact theory | articulated. A | or no | ||
Excellent | mentioned and | brief evaluation | articulation of | ||
evaluation of the | the solution has | has been | Social Impact | ||
solution covering | market value | conducted on the | theory. No | ||
all key facets. The | solution. | evaluation | |||
solution has market | conducted on | ||||
value | the solution | ||||
Business model (20%) | A creative way to identify the business model for | Clearly identified business model for innovative | The business model for the innovative | Limited or no business model presented. The | No attempt |
innovative solution | solution | solution is | solution does | ||
addressing the | addressing the | identified. The | not adequately | ||
social problem. The | social problem. | solution addresses | or realistically | ||
solution clearly | The solution | the social | address the | ||
helps to address the | clearly helps to | problem. The | social problem. | ||
Business or social problem. The | address the social | social value | The social value | ||
social value | value creation and | generated is | generated is | ||
generated | it is assessable | assessable and | poorly | ||
above and beyond | articulated | articulated. | |||
current state is | |||||
comprehensively | |||||
articulated | |||||
Conclusion | Superior | Good connection | Satisfactory | Weak | No attempt |
(10%) | conclusions drawn | between analysis | connection | connection | |
using all relevant | and conclusion | between analysis | between | ||
analysis. | and | analysis and | |||
Conclusions are | conclusions | conclusions or | |||
realistic and | recommendatio | ||||
professional | ns. Introduces | ||||
new arguments | |||||
inappropriately | |||||
Creativity | Highly Innovative | Innovative | Fair solution | Little creativity | No attempt |
(10%) | Solution with | solution | provided with | shown with the | |
exceptional clarity | with good an | improvements | solution and no | ||
and simplicity for | easily | possible for the | or | ||
the | understandable | Social Impact | vague Social | ||
Social Impact | Social Impact | Theory. | Impact | ||
Theory | Theory. | Theory | |||
articulated. | |||||
Research Skill | Excellent research | Good research | Satisfactory | Poor or little | No attempt |
(15%) | skills on identifying | skills | research | research | |
relevant statistics | on identifying | skills regarding | skills | ||
around the Social | relevant statistics | relevant expert | demonstrated | ||
Problem | around the Social | opinion and | with statistics | ||
Problem | statistics | and | |||
around the Social | expert opinion | ||||
Problem | around the | ||||
Social | |||||
Problem. | |||||
Report | Professional | Logical structure | Appropriate | Few headings. | No attempt |
Presentation | structure, guiding | and analysis. The | structure and | Weak flow. No | |
reader through | table is readable | presents an | table of contents | ||
logical analysis. | organised | or page numbers | |||
Superior | argument. Table | ||||
development of | of contents | ||||
table | provided |
Assessment Task 2B- Verbal Pitch/ Presentation Weighting: 10%
Due date: Week 9-12 Duration: up to 15 minutes.
Presentation Style: Pitch deck/ Business Canvas Model/ Powerpoint Submission style: In Class Presentation
The purpose of the verbal pitch is to provide opportunity to pitch (present) on your business canvas model that you developed and proposed in assessment Task 2. You and your team members should be able to present your Business model in a way that is convenient and encourage the panel members to be part of your business.
2B: Verbal Pitch Rubric
HD | D-C | P | F | |
Quality of | Points Range: 30 | Points Range: | Points Range: 1.79 | Points Range: |
Idea | (30%) – 24 (24%) | 2.39 (23.9%)-1.8 | (17.9%) – 1.5 (15%) | 1.49 (14.9%) – 0 (0%) |
Excellent quality idea – | (18%) | Satisfactory quality | Poor quality of idea. | |
with pitch deck | Good quality idea with | idea. Opportunities to | Opportunities to | |
covering and clearly | pitch deck covering | improve pitch deck | significantly improve | |
articulating all 8 areas | and articulating all | and some of the 8 | pitch deck and some of | |
with a superb business | areas with business | areas. Business | the 8 areas. Business | |
model and social | model and social | model and social | model and social | |
impact clearly | impact articulated. | impact need | impact unclear or non- | |
articulated. | improvement | existent. | ||
Language | Points Range: | Points Range: | Points Range: 1.79 | Points Range: |
3 (30%) -2.4 (24%) | 2.39 (23.9%)- 1.8 | (17.9%) – 1.5 (15%) | 1.49 (14.9%) – 0 (0%) | |
Language choices are | (18%) | Language choices are | Language choices are | |
imaginative, | Language choices are | mundane, | unclear and minimally | |
memorable, | thoughtful, generally | commonplace and | support the | |
compelling, and | support the | partially support the | effectiveness of the | |
enhance the | effectiveness and | effectiveness and | presentation. | |
effectiveness and | impact of the | impact of the | Language is not | |
impact of the | presentation. | presentation. | appropriate to | |
presentation. Language | Language is | Language is | audience. | |
is appropriate to | appropriate to | generally appropriate | ||
audience. | audience. | to audience. | ||
Delivery | Points Range: | Points Range: | Points Range: | Points Range: 1.49 |
and | 3 (30%) – 2.4 (24%) | 2.39 (23.9%) – 1.8 | 1.79(17.9%)- 1.5 | (14.9%) – 0 (0%) |
engagement | Presenters make a | (18%) | (15%) | Little eye contact was |
Personal connection | Regular eye contact | Eye contact was | made with audience. | |
with audience using | was made with all | intermittent or | Overly reliant on notes | |
eye contact to gauge | members of the | focused on one | and / or slides which | |
reactions and | audience, and created | person. Use of notes/ | prevented engagement | |
understanding. Create | engagement. | or reading from | with the audience. | |
enthusiasm about topic | Enthusiasm shown for | slides was obvious | Lacks interest or | |
in others. Appear at | topic. Delivery (pace, | and limited | enthusiasm for the | |
ease and confident. | audibility, clarity, | engagement with | topic. Awkward, | |
Delivery (pace, | intonation, | audience. Shows | Obviously nervous. | |
audibility, clarity, | mannerisms, and | interest in the topic. | Delivery (pace, | |
intonation, | gestures) was | Body language | audibility, clarity, | |
mannerisms, and | consistently good and | and/or voice indicate | intonation, |
gestures) were consistently excellent and making the presentation compelling, and speakers appear
polished and confident. |
supported message. Making the presentation interesting, and speakers appear comfortable and
prepared. |
lack of confidence. Delivery (pace, audibility, clarity, intonation, mannerisms, and gestures) was
inconsistent. |
mannerisms, and gestures) detract from the presentation.
Speakers appear Uncomfortable and unprepared |
|
Pitch Deck | Points Range: | Points Range: | Points Range: | Points Range: |
Quality | 1 (10%) – 0.8 (8%) | .79 (7.9%) – .6 (6%) | .59 (5.9%) – .5 (5%) | 0.49 (4.9%) – 0 (0%) |
Clear, easy to interpret, | Mostly clear, easy to | Some aids too | Unclear, difficult to | |
easy to read, watch or | interpret, easy to read, | complex, crowded or | interpret. May be hard | |
hear. Visually | watch or hear. | difficult interpret. | to read, watch or hear. | |
appealing. | Some creativity and | Some aids difficult to | Technically inaccurate, | |
Creative. Always well- | visual appeal. | read, watch or hear. | poorly constructed, | |
coordinated with | Generally well- | Lacked creativity and | and/or irrelevant. | |
content. | coordinated | / or visual appeal. | No creativity. | |
Aids comprehension of | With content. | Inconsistent | Aids detract from | |
the message. | Contributes to | coordination with | The comprehension of | |
comprehension of the | content, and did not | the message or used as | ||
message | aid the message. | a script |
Assessment Task 3: Final Exam (50%)
Weighting: 50% Date and time TBA
Assessment description for the final exam will be made available in week 10.
ENT3100 Entrepreneurship and Innovation
Assessment
Tasks
and
Marking
Criteria
T2, 2021 Dr John Annakis.
Unit
Assessment
Details
Task
and
Details
Individual
or
Group
Weighting
Unit learning
outcomes that
this assessment
task
related
to
Assessment
due
date
1.
Mid
–
term
Test during
the
class
Individual
15%
ULO1
Due:
week
6
2A. Business
canvas
Model
Group
25%
ULOs
2, 3, 4, 5
and
6
Due:
week
9
2B.
Verbal
pitch
Group
10%
ULO
7
Due:
week
10
&
11
3.
Exam
Individual
50%
ULOs
1, 2, 3, 4,
5,
6
and 7
TBA
Assessment Task 1
–
Mid
–
term Test
Weighting
:
15%
Due date: Week 6
Submission Style
–
ta
ke
home
down load
from
Moodle
word file and answer multiple
choice questions
and send back completed
answers. O
pens
9 am
Monday 30 August,
2021 submit by Thursday 2 September ,
2021
5:00pm AEST
.
The Mid
–
term test consist of
30
multiple Choice Questions.
Assessment Task 2A
–
Business Canvas Model (Group report)
Weighting:
25%
Due date: Week
9
Word
Limit:
>
2500
.
Submission
style:
Via
Moodle
Topic: We’re looking for your innovative ideas
for a new start
–
up
.
your group is to
develop
,
it could
be
either
a new business start
–
up or
a
social enterprise start
–
up.
It
original and your unique business which is designed for launching (not an existing
business).
·
Identify
a
problem
you
are
passionate
about
addressing
as
a
team
·
Identify
a
way
to
address
the
problem through
an innovative
business solution
ENT3100 Entrepreneurship and Innovation
Assessment Tasks and Marking Criteria
T2, 2021 Dr John Annakis.
Unit Assessment Details
Task and
Details
Individual or
Group
Weighting Unit learning
outcomes that
this assessment
task related to
Assessment due
date
1. Mid-term
Test during
the class
Individual 15% ULO1 Due: week 6
2A. Business
canvas Model
Group 25% ULOs 2, 3, 4, 5
and 6
Due: week 9
2B. Verbal
pitch
Group 10% ULO 7
Due: week 10 &
11
3. Exam Individual 50% ULOs 1, 2, 3, 4,
5, 6 and 7
TBA
Assessment Task 1- Mid-term Test
Weighting: 15%
Due date: Week 6
Submission Style – take home down load
from Moodle word file and answer multiple
choice questions and send back completed
answers. Opens 9 am Monday 30 August,
2021 submit by Thursday 2 September , 2021
5:00pm AEST.
The Mid-term test consist of 30 multiple Choice Questions.
Assessment Task 2A- Business Canvas Model (Group report)
Weighting: 25%
Due date: Week 9
Word Limit: > 2500.
Submission style: Via Moodle
Topic: We’re looking for your innovative ideas for a new start-up. your group is to
develop, it could be either a new business start -up or a social enterprise start-up. It
original and your unique business which is designed for launching (not an existing
business).
Identify a problem you are passionate about addressing as a team
Identify a way to address the problem through an innovative business solution