Individual Case Study

Rubric

Assignment 1 rubric
Assignment 1 rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
Content / Requirement

22 to >17.5 Pts

High Distinction
Exceeds requirements and exhibits significant evidence of an original approach to the entire assignment. Comprehensive coverage and convincing articulation in answering all questions.

17.5 to >15.35 Pts

Distinction
Meets requirements for content and exhibits evidence of original content in the entire assessment. Thorough coverage and clear articulation in answering the set questions.

15.35 to >13.1 Pts

Credit
Meets requirements for content in answering the set questions. Good discussion with reasonable evidence to support your answers.

13.1 to >10.95 Pts

Pass
Meets basic requirement for content, little original content, and/or basic input with some gaps in understanding.

10.95 to >0 Pts

Fail
Content does not adequately indicate an understanding of the task and/or limited information is provided that does not justify the achievement of assessment requirements
22 pts
Structure

12 to >9.5 Pts

High Distinction
Outstanding presentation of material which support all requirements.

9.5 to >8.35 Pts

Distinction
Structure is sound throughout and supports logical exposition

8.35 to >7.1 Pts

Credit
Content is generally organised logically with some aspects needing more attention

7.1 to >5.95 Pts

Pass
Structure is just sufficient to present the content, and/or ideas often presented in a disorganised manner.

5.95 to >0 Pts

Fail
Nil or disorganised structre
12 pts
Use of Evidence and Referencing

8 to >6.29 Pts

High Distinction
Outstanding integration of a wide range of evidence and all points are substantiated by primary resources, with evidence of a wide range of research, and with all sources cited correctly.

6.29 to >5.55 Pts

Distinction
Excellent integration of evidence into material and primary sources use to support most points, and all sources are cited in the correct format.

5.55 to >4.69 Pts

Credit
Most points are supported by third-party evidence, and/or most sources are cited and are in the correct format.

4.69 to >3.95 Pts

Pass
Some examples are used but only of a basic nature, and/or gives citation for some sources and inconsistent in citation style.

3.95 to >0 Pts

Fail
Little or no use of evidence to support content requirement, and/or copied material with no citations.
8 pts
Mechanics

8 to >6.29 Pts

High Distinction
Consistently clear style and use of language encouraging ease of comprehension and insightful conclusions; logical and high-quality arguments. Consistently meets academic referencing requirements by drawing on credible sources and referencing fully follows RMIT Harvard referencing stye in text and in the Referencing List.

6.29 to >5.55 Pts

Distinction
Clear presentation, content flow and good use of language; easy to read and draws clear conclusions. Almost always meeting academic referencing requirements by drawing on credible sources; referencing following RMIT Harvard referencing style in text and in the Referencing List.

5.55 to >4.69 Pts

Credit
Overall presentation is easy to digest, and language succinct and well chosen. May have minor errors in academic referencing or applying the RMIT Harvard referencing style in the Referencing List.

4.69 to >3.95 Pts

Pass
Layout is adequate with acceptable flow and use of language; some misspellings and grammatical errors. Academic referencing require improvement, e.g.: referencing partially follows the RMIT Harvard referencing style in text or in the Referencing List, or may have fallen short in terms of quality of references used. Limited conclusions and recommendations.

3.95 to >0 Pts

Fail
Layout is confusing. Logic, flow and use of language are not clear, and/or with many errors in spellings and/or grammar; limited or no use of academic referencing and referencing does not follow the RMIT Harvard referencing style.
8 pts
Total points: 50