Individual Reflection

Module title Marketing for Financial Services
Submission date, time Turnitin submission by the end of wk 22 lecture hour
Feedback type & date Written feedback on the submitted work in 15 working days
Word count 300 words max.
Assignment type Each group member is required to critically evaluate the group work during Assessment 2, then write a 500 word reflective statement on what lessons can be learnt, and what can be improved.
Assignment structure and format ·         Report must be word-processed in font size 14, font style, Arial, and 1.5 line spacing.

·         Space inserted between paragraphs

·         Page numbers inserted throughout

·         The page orientation should be ‘portrait’

·         Margins on all sides of the page should be no less than 2.54 cm

·         Exceeding the word count will result in a penalty of 10% of your marks for your work.

Assessed learning outcome (s) The student should be able to:

a)      Demonstrate ability to examine their understanding of the learning they have gained so far and how this learning has helped build both cognitive and behavioural skills

b)     Manifest evidence that is meaningful to their understanding. For example, what have they learnt from their experience at lectures and seminars and how has this experience changed their current thinking?

c)      Evaluate how the knowledge gained from this experience can be used in their future employment

This assessment addresses Learning Outcomes 6, 13 and 14 as listed in Section 4. Module Overview.

Module weighting % 20%
Key reading and learning resources No need to reference this assessment.
Assignment marking criteria rubric (reflective placement account)

 

As this is a reflective essay, hence, description of what you have done will not suffice. In order to reflect, you will have to describe, but keep description to absolute minimum, and focus on reflection.

 

Assessment criteria

45% and below Mere description of what you did, of what/why went wrong without any reflection.
46-55% A lack of reflection on the problems described previously. Viewpoints and interpretations are missing, inappropriate, and/or unsupported.
56-65% A minimal reflection on the problems described previously. Viewpoints and interpretations are unsupported or supported with flawed arguments.
66-75% A general reflection on the problems described previously. Viewpoints and interpretations are supported.
76-95% An in-depth reflection on the problems described previously. Viewpoints and interpretations are insightful and well supported.
100% Plus adopting a presentation format as illustrated in the module handbook

 

The following table details the support you will be receiving for this assignment and the feedback opportunities you will have.

Support and draft feedback sessions for Individual Reflection
Coursework briefing

You will be briefly introduced to this assessment in Wk 1. A detailed assessment instruction will be given in Wk 18.

Draft feedback opportunities

Feedback session is provided on Wk 20 where you are welcome to raise any questions or concerns for the assessment.

Additional support

A format for this assessment is provided in the UniHub.