TheoryAnalysis

Theory Analysis Paper 2 – 50 points

EPAS 2015 Foundation 2.1

Using the movie Moonlight, explain each character using the theory’s terms and concepts. In other words, how would this theory help us understand this character. Use at least 5 professional references (peer-reviewed journal articles, studies, books, book chapters, etc.) to support the theories. Address the following:

1. Use the Culturalism perspective to explain Chiron (1pg)

2. Use the Culturalism perspective to explain Juan (1pg)

3. Use the Feminist Theory to explain Juan (1pg)

4. Use the Feminist Theory to explain Teresa (1pg)

5. In summary describe the strengths and limitations of both the Cultural perspective and the Feminist Theory (1pg)

The paper should be approximately 7 pages in length (including references or Title page) in APA style. No abstract needed. Worth 50 points.

Theory Paper 2- RUBRIC – 50 pts

Unsatisfactory Marginal Proficient Exemplary
1 2 3 4
APA & Writing Quality (5 Points) One of the following are demonstrated; (1) paper includes cover page and references; (2) paper consistently and flawlessly follows guidelines and APA manual (6th ed.) for headings, spacing, in-text and reference list citations; (3) no spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors are readily apparent; (4) paper includes at least 5 references; (5) consistently follows assignment format and no sections are omitted; (6) content is included under the proper heading

(0 points)

Two of the following are demonstrated; (1) paper includes cover page and references; (2) paper consistently and flawlessly follows guidelines and APA manual (6th ed.) for headings, spacing, in-text and reference list citations; (3) no spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors are readily apparent; (4) paper includes at least 5 references; (5) consistently follows assignment format and no sections are omitted; (6) content is included under the proper heading

(1-2 points)

Four of the following are demonstrated; (1) paper includes cover page and references; (2) paper consistently and flawlessly follows guidelines and APA manual (6th ed.) for headings, spacing, in-text and reference list citations; (3) no spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors are readily apparent; (4) paper includes at least 5 references; (5) consistently follows assignment format and no sections are omitted; (6) content is included under the proper heading

(3-4 points)

All of the following are demonstrated in an exemplary way; (1) paper includes cover page and references; (2) paper consistently and flawlessly follows guidelines and APA manual (6th ed.) for headings, spacing, in-text and reference list citations; (3) no spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors are readily apparent; (4) paper includes at least 5 references; (5) consistently follows assignment format and no sections are omitted; (6) content is included under the proper heading

(5 points)

Explanation of Chiron with Culturalism Perspective

(10 points)

EPAS 2015

Foundation 2.1

Description includes minimal explanation of case and behaviors based on theory and inadequately explains how various levels function, and uses terms outside of the theory

(0 points)

Description includes minimal explanation of case and behaviors based on theory or inadequately explains how various levels function, or uses terms outside of the theory

(1-5 points)

Description explains case and behaviors and attitudes of characters solely based on theory; explains how various levels function, uses terms of the theory adequately

(6-8 points)

Description explains case and behaviors and attitudes of characters solely based on theory; explains how various levels function, uses terms of the theory in an exemplary way

(9-10 points)

Explanation of Juan with Culturalism Pers. (10 points) Description includes minimal explanation of case and behaviors based on theory and inadequately explains how various levels function, and uses terms outside of the theory

(0 points)

Description includes minimal explanation of case and behaviors based on theory or inadequately explains how various levels function, or uses terms outside of the theory

(1-5 points)

Description explains case and behaviors and attitudes of characters solely based on theory; explains how various levels function, uses terms of the theory adequately

(6-8 points)

Description explains case and behaviors and attitudes of characters solely based on theory; explains how various levels function, uses terms of the theory in an exemplary way

(9-10 points)

Explanation of Juan with Feminist Theory (10 points) Description includes minimal explanation of case and behaviors based on theory and inadequately explains how various levels function, and uses terms outside of the theory

(0 points)

Description includes minimal explanation of case and behaviors based on theory or inadequately explains how various levels function, or uses terms outside of the theory

(1-5 points)

Description explains case and behaviors and attitudes of characters solely based on theory; explains how various levels function, uses terms of the theory adequately

(6-8 points)

Description explains case and behaviors and attitudes of characters solely based on theory; explains how various levels function, uses terms of the theory in an exemplary way

(9-10 points)

Explanation of Teresa with Feminist Theory (10 points) Description includes minimal explanation of case and behaviors based on theory and inadequately explains how various levels function, and uses terms outside of the theory

(0 points)

Description includes minimal explanation of case and behaviors based on theory or inadequately explains how various levels function, or uses terms outside of the theory

(1-5 points)

Description explains case and behaviors and attitudes of characters solely based on theory; explains how various levels function, uses terms of the theory adequately

(6-8 points)

Description explains case and behaviors and attitudes of characters solely based on theory; explains how various levels function, uses terms of the theory in an exemplary way

(9-10 points)

Appraisal of strengths and limitations

5 points)

None of the strengths and weaknesses are presented

(0 points)

Few strengths and weaknesses are presented, they are poorly described, and/or all levels are not addressed

(1-2 points)

Several strengths and several weaknesses are presented but they are marginally described or all levels have not been addressed

(3-4 points)

Several strengths and several weaknesses are presented at all three levels (micro, mezzo, and macro) in an exemplary way

(5 points)